In spite of tough economic times and government budget cuts, my school has seen an explosion in technology over the past year. I quickly went from feeling like a cavewoman communicating with my students through cryptic “cavedrawings” on a CHALKboard, to feeling like I was suddenly catapulted into the world of the future with the addition of a Smartboard. At first, I didn’t know whether to consider this piece of equipment a blessing or a curse. I felt lucky to have this technology, yet overwhelmed in knowing that it possessed numerous capabilities and that I lacked the knowledge to fully utilize them.
Luckily, our school media specialist and technology specialist recognized the fact that these items of technology were of no benefit unless the operator was well-trained in their use. These ladies also recognized the fact that they were just as uninformed as teachers about Smartboards. So, instead of developing training themselves, they chose to arrange training through our local RESA and UGA. The trainers that were sent were specialized in the teaching of technology use and provided our school with a highly qualified level of instruction. In creating a list of DO’s and DON’Ts for technology staff development, I would use this experience to begin my list.
DON’T feel that you have to develop the training yourself.
DO utilize or modify training resources that are already available.
In addition to your local RESA, many training resources are also provided with the purchase of technology products. For instance, our school recently purchased an electronic tutorial program called “Education City.” Our media specialist and technology specialist wisely took advantage of the training this program offered with purchase and scheduled a training session for all teachers. This training was of the “conference call” type with the Education City representative not physically present, but instead communicating through an internet phone call. On the Smartboard, participants could watch the rep manipulate the program and could ask questions if needed.
DON’T disrespect teachers’ time.
DO keep training as brief as possible.
DO create an agenda to keep the training going in a productive direction.
Our media and technology specialists have a busy schedule themselves and recognize teachers’ lack of planning time. The Education City training and two other trainings we’ve had at my school this year took only about 30 to 45 minutes. As a teacher, I appreciated the information that was delivered and the concise nature in which it was delivered. An outline/agenda was created to keep each meeting on pace and also served as a handy and brief reference sheet for future use.
DO email all handouts to teachers in digital format.
While many teachers do appreciate having a physical agenda, outline, or notes to refer to during training, they are often swamped with papers. Many now prefer to save a digital copy as opposed to paper. Be sure to offer both formats to participants.
DON’T forget about digital, self-paced modes of training.
While, I feel that my school does an adequate job with technology training, I do wish they would consider using more technology in their delivering methods. In going through the MEDT program, I have come to appreciate podcasts and digital documents as effective and convenient forms of instruction and information delivery. I believe that training presented in these manners could provide teachers with more flexibility in their schedules and constant access to training information. In presenting training for technology, I hope my school considers using some newer technologies.
I enjoyed and applaud your "do's and don'ts". I feel that our training in technology has greatly improved as the technology has increased. While at times I don't feel we are training or acquiring technology fast enough, I think we are much further than we were only two years ago (I, too, had the green chalkboard as the interactive board). I thought your comment of accessing other resources to help inform and teach new programs is an excellent point. As we tend to say, "don't reinvent the wheel". I also appreciate the comment on time everyone in a school does not have enough time, so following your "do's" of keeping meetings concise and productive is very wise and welcomed.
ReplyDeleteWhat a great list of DOs and DON'Ts! You make great points about time, handouts, and using technology for training, but I especially appreciate your point about not feeling like we have to know everything! Just knowing where to turn for the info is a huge help for teachers. This gives me an idea to find out what teachers need, then check Atomic Learning for helpful videos to recommend to them. They have access to look, too, but by taking the time to find the videos for them, I become an instructional partner with them and offer support to them, which is a HUGE part of what I should be doing as a media specialist!!
ReplyDeleteGreat post! :)
By Cecilia:
ReplyDeleteWonderful and thought-provoking post! I will keep this to refer to as a how-to when I plan in-service technology training modules. When I spoke with my mentor about technology training, she had a lot to say. Mostly, there are those who are comfortable with technology and those that are not. She has shown and taught the uses of a document camera; only one teacher ever checks it out; and not very often.
One teacher told me, "I hate everything that's new. It takes me a long time to figure out (technology)". I view this as the prime barrier to technology training. While this feeling is regrettable, it is honest, and is self-aware. At least this is a starting point. I think it would be beneficial to offer one-on-one training, because some teachers might: (1) be embarrassed; (2) not have much time; (3)need specialized instruction; and (4) need a lot of hand-holding.
Now, obviously, neither teachers nor media specialists can spend every free moment in one-on-one training. Maybe if one teacher per month, or even one teacher every two months were privately instructed; there would be some converts to the technology world. I agree with the main posting on this subject about supporting documentation in many formats that would appeal and support teacher usage.
I believe your list of do's and dont's is very accurate in how teachers feel about technology training. I agree that trainings should be concise (the agenda you mentioned always helps), considerate of what teachers already know (I've been through trainings in the past that were too basic for their learners), and should be provided during the school day. Teachers do not have time for summer or evening trainings. I also like your idea of having more self-paced trainings. I believe that a well-developed self-paced training can be just as effective as a training with a real live person. We can't neglect training just for the sake of saving time. Schools spend a lot of money on technology, so it would be wasteful not to learn how to use it, but technology specialists should understand the importance of saving time and our first priority: being in the classroom with our students.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your post and found myself envious of the strides taken by your SLMS to meet the technology training needs of teachers. While I hate to be pessimistic, I must say that my experience was very different. I have never had any kind of formal technology training. I was the first teacher in my school to get a SmartBoard. It took the IT Department 4 weeks to install it and then they were gone. My SLMS was 2 years from retirement and told me she didn't intend to learn anything new. So it was up to me to teach myself how to use this thing.
ReplyDeleteSo what I need to do is take my past negative experience and use your list of Do and Don't to develop a comprehensive technology training plan for my SLMC.
I think your feelings about the blessings/curse of having technology is felt by so many teachers. Kudos to your media specialists for securing the necessary training for the Smartboards. It sounds like they are very efficient and resourceful. I liked the Do’s and Don’ts List. It was brief and to the point, just as training should be.
ReplyDelete